J. Russell

joseph bahgat — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:46:04 -0500

All this testimony and the only physical evidence is the over 500 test that he passed. So I guess you can just get a group of banned atheletes, promise them reinstatement if they testify (sorry, testify against Armstrong). They say what you want to hear and that makes him guilty. This has to be the biggest witchhunt in decades.

J Beaty

joseph bahgat — Thu, 11 Oct 2012 09:46:04 -0500

Terrible piece of journalism. Lance wasn't different to any other pro cyclist at that time, they all doped. The main point is to compare the racing in the TDF then and now. The fastest climb of Alpe D'Huez by Armstrong was 37:36 in 2004 and in 2011 was 4 minutes slower by Sanchez and Contador. With better technology should the more recent time really finish over 110% of Armstrong's ride. Was he that much better? At the pinnacle of a sport where 1% or 2% increase is the difference between winning and losing 10% is a complete joke. If you can't see that you must have your head stuck in the sand! He just played the game better, had a more professional doping program because U.S Postal, Nike, Trek and Giro were paying him g'zillions. I want my £30 back for the money I wasted buying this cheaters book. I don't mind cheaters who say they are cheaters. Get him to admit it, write a book on cheating and I'll certainly buy that. He can then pay the Sunday Times back!

The Sports & Entertainment Law Playbook - In Every Other Country but the U.S.A. Lance is Still THE Champion - Comments

J. Russell

J Beaty